Most hospitals stitch together a tool for CDI, another for coding, another for queries, another for denials. Medically captures clinical truth once — reading the whole record, citing the evidence, and flagging findings in both directions with a defensibility score on every one — and serves every downstream outcome from it.
Notes, labs, medications, vitals, orders, flowsheets, microbiology, imaging and pathology results, prior codes — across 100% of charts, not a sample. Read like a clinician would.
Every finding, code, and query links to the verbatim chart text that triggered it — located in the record, verifiable in one click, defensible in an audit.
Unsupported diagnoses and DRG downgrades surface with the same prominence as upgrades. Every finding carries a defensibility score, with the arithmetic shown.
Never-fabricate guarantees, anti-upcoding guardrails, reason-coded decisions, and a person approving every change that touches a patient's record.
Catch the documented-but-uncoded diagnoses before the claim goes out — and the documented-but-unsupported ones, too. Each finding is shown with the clinical evidence behind it, its DRG and dollar impact, and a defensibility score, so your specialists verify in a click instead of hunting through the chart.
Revenue-first AI only ever moves the DRG up. Medically surfaces unsupported diagnoses and downgrades with the same prominence as upgrades, evaluates each finding against the clinical criteria the specific payer actually applies, and scores how likely the diagnosis is to survive clinical-validation review — with the arithmetic shown, not a black box.
Model rationale is shown separately and labeled as not used in the score. A payer selector re-runs the pass against a different payer's criteria.
Upgrade, unsupported, and downgrade findings live in one list with equal prominence. Downside exposure is tracked in dollars, just like upside.
Criteria met, evidence strength, consistency, and counter-evidence combine into a 0–100 score. Same inputs, same number, every time — and the breakdown is stored with it.
Each hospital chooses which definitions apply per payer. Findings are evaluated against what that payer will accept, not a one-size algorithm.
Every disposition is appended, never overwritten. Export evidence, criteria, score breakdown, reason codes, and model versions in one permission-gated file.
Your coders stop reading entire charts to find the one line that matters. Medically auto-suggests ICD-10 and CPT codes with a confidence score, the supporting evidence, and the DRG math — they confirm, adjust, and move on.
Compliant, pre-drafted queries reach the physician inside their workflow — not days after discharge. The clinical indicators and evidence are already attached, so the answer takes seconds.
Labs show lactate 3.1, HR 112, temp 38.6°C. Based on your clinical judgment, please clarify the condition being treated:
Everyone optimizes the chart. Almost no one models how the specific payer will adjudicate it. Medically scores each claim against that plan's rules and tells your team exactly which evidence is missing — before submission, when you can still fix it.
Most tools stop at a letter you copy and paste. Medically reads the denial, assembles the evidence from the original pre-bill finding, drafts the appeal with the payer's own policy cited, submits it electronically, tracks the deadline, and reports overturns by payer.
The same engine reads outpatient and clinic encounters: HCC capture with MEAT evidence for risk adjustment, E/M and ED facility leveling, and missing or mis-leveled charges — with conservative, audit-aware guardrails, because E/M and ED leveling are active OIG audit areas.
Documentation shouldn't be the reason your physicians stay late. They dictate or type the way they think; Medically turns it into a clean, structured note — SOAP, H&P, progress, consult, or discharge — in seconds, ready for review.
68 y/o F presents with 3 days of progressive dyspnea and bilateral lower-extremity edema. Known CHF (EF 30%).
BP 152/94, HR 96, SpO₂ 88% RA. BNP 1,840. CXR: bilateral pulmonary edema.
Acute on chronic systolic heart failure exacerbation.
IV furosemide, strict I/O, daily weights, telemetry.
See realized revenue — billed and paid, not projected — traced from finding to claim to remittance. Every number links back to the chart that produced it. The report your board asks for, ready before they ask.
Every chart already holds the answer — Ask Medically lets your team get to it in plain language. Ask a question about the record in front of you and get a response tied to the exact chart text behind it. No hunting, no leaving your workflow, and nothing you have to take on faith.
The record supports a query. Two SIRS criteria are met — HR 112 and temp 38.6 °C — with lactate 3.1. Sepsis and its acuity aren't documented yet.
To assign A41.9, the provider needs to document “sepsis” and its acuity. The evidence above supports a compliant, non-leading query — Medically can draft it.
Direct identifiers are minimized and masked before the chart ever reaches the model.
The model reads only that de-identified chart — nothing else in your environment.
You get a plain-language answer with the exact chart evidence cited beneath it.
Processing is transient — not retained beyond the request, never used to train AI. Your team makes the call.
Illustrative examples. Every answer is grounded in the specific chart in front of you and cited to its source evidence — nothing is asserted that can’t be traced to the record.
A read-only HL7/FHIR connection, no rip-and-replace, and a free retrospective look-back on charts you've already billed — so you see the exact findings, cited to the record, before the first live discharge.
Read-only connection to your EHR through pre-built HL7 v2 and FHIR R4 connectors (or a secure flat-file feed). A signed BAA is in place before any PHI moves.
We run 90 days of already-billed charts and show every finding your team — and any existing vendor — missed, in both directions, each one cited and scored. No obligation.
Live pre-bill review inside your bill-hold window. Your reviewers work the ranked worklist in the workflow they already know; nothing changes for physicians until you choose.
Add coding, denial prevention, appeals, outpatient and risk adjustment, or the Scribe — on your timeline, on the same engine and the same evidence.
Target go-live: six weeks or less from a signed BAA. Implementation is scoped and written down before kickoff, so your IT team knows exactly what is being asked of them.
PHI handled to the standards your security and compliance teams require. BAA available on request.
Medically reads the record; humans approve every change. Nothing is written back without sign-off.
Every finding carries its evidence, criteria, score breakdown, disposition, reason code, and model version — exportable on demand.
Two-way findings, bias and drift monitoring, never-fabricate guarantees, and lower codes when the evidence warrants.
Pre-built HL7 v2 and FHIR R4 connectors mean a read-only connection and a go-live measured in weeks — not a rip-and-replace. Findings are delivered in your CDI and coding workflow; write-back happens only with a person's sign-off.
Drop your work email and we'll walk your team through the platform on a 30-minute demo — no slideware.
Start with a $0 pilot — pay only on revenue we recover. See pricing →
Have questions first? Contact us →
Product screens on this page are illustrative. Patient details are fictional; values show the shape of the output, not live data.